I’d heard rumour about the use of XHTML for fixed layouts in InDesign before the announcement of the new Creative Cloud 2014 suite this month, and having text-based pages — instead of them being purely image-based — sounded like a fantastic thing.
Add that Adobe included the ability to export the epub:type attribute, and it seemed like there was a lot to look forward to as far as making accessible ebooks.
But the all important question lingered… what would the actual output look like, and would it match the hype?
Just an interesting note for those who don’t follow epubcheck development that localization of the messages in at least a couple of languages is being carried out for an upcoming release (Japanese and German).
Doesn’t sound like they’ll be able to cover all messages, since some are inherent to the technologies being used and can’t be modified, but for an internationally-used publishing format a step in the right direction.
So how many metadata standards is too many metadata standards? How many metadata frameworks is too many metadata frameworks? How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man? (Seven!)
EPUB has its own share of metadata headaches. On the one hand, you need enough centralized metadata to facilitate reading system presentation of your book to readers. On the other, you need metadata to move the publication through a distribution chain. And even then there are people who want MARC, MODS, JATS and other metadata to facilitate their own processing.
The EPUB specification sort of floats between problems neatly enough, but it’s yet another custom framework that in my experience causes as much confusion as it solves, and leaves me wondering if there were another way to handle metadata, like going all-in on schema.org in a future version.
Annotations are kind of a weird thing to me, at least from a format perspective. Being able to create them is an integral part of the reading experience for many readers, no doubt, but technically they have nothing to do with the structure of an ebook itself. They’re more like a layer that lives on top of the format.
Seen in that light, it’s hard to argue that EPUB itself has to define an annotation framework. Leave it to the reading system developers to figure out annotations in EPUB or any other format they might support, right?
Of course, therein lies a big problem. Leave it the vendors and you get proprietary implementations that can’t travel with your content across devices and apps. You also can’t distribute annotations separately from the content. That’s effectively the world we live in now; another brick in the wall of the walled gardens.
If you’ve ever taken a read of the EPUB 3 Content Documents spec, you’ve undoubtedly seen the warnings about HTML5 features being experimental, and to use them with caution. Caveat emptor and all that…
Did you ever skip on over to the HTML 5.0 spec and have a look at what features those were? Did you use them with caution? (Everyone follows specs to the letter of the law, right?)
If not, as the 5.0 revision winds down you might have missed the various features that have recently been pushed out. If you liked the details/summary elements, for example, you’re waiting for HTML 5.1 now for official status.
Hm, time really flew the last few months between edupub and a few other things. Can you tell my January was a bit on the slow side?
Anyway, to get back in the swing of things, I just wanted to note that http://www.idpf.org/forums is still active for asking EPUB questions. When the EPUBZone microsite was added the forum link disappeared from the main menu — and the link from the mircosite goes directly to the EPUB3 forum, making it appear the other three might have been retired — but the all the forums are alive and well, if a little harder to get to right now.
I’ve reported the problem, as have others, so hopefully full access will be restored from the IDPF site soon. In the meantime, though, don’t hesitate to use them on the idea they’re no longer frequented.
I have another long-standing interest in text-to-speech rendering from my time at CNIB, where the two main outputs we were generating were xml for braille full-text production and synthetically voiced DAISY 2.02 back matter components.
The reason we were TTS’ing back matter was that spending time reading indexes and bibliographies is an enormous waste of human resources — it’s a lag on getting books out to readers and would result in a precipitous drop in total output.
Very few people ever read the back matter, too, at least in general circulating libraries like we had. TTS meant that we didn’t have deny readers information that otherwise would have been omitted.
But to the point of this post, when I first saw the enhancements in EPUB 3 to improve text-to-speech playback, and a means of distributing high-quality text for rendering on the client side, I had stars in my eyes. Here was a way to bring high-quality voicing without huge audio downloads. But two plus years on, how close are we to realizing the potential?
I suppose it’s natural that I wonder every so often how well EPUB could be used to represent acts, regulations, case law and all the other (boring to everyone else) documents that are critical to the field. I did get my first “real” data job in legal publishing, after all.
And, yes, I realize how sad it must sound that I spend my free time thinking about translating legal documents to EPUB.
But whatever your sympathies, I spent a little time looking at the problems again by tinkering with some legislation I pulled off the web, so thought I’d recap what I was finding.
Can you have an ebook format for education that doesn’t support math? (Note: it’s a rhetorical question!)
Math is pervasive, despite the common perception that it’s only for STEM. Even novels have been known to include equations from time-to-time.
And yet consumer-end MathML support in digital works is still lacking, despite two decades of work in W3C. If you want the whole story, Peter Krautzberger has written a fantastic article on the history of MathML and support in browsers that I’d highly recommend reading. I’m not going to attempt anything similar today, as there’s nothing of value a math neophyte like me could add.
Rather, what has me thinking MathML is the upcoming second EDUPUB conference, and the lack of consistent rendering, and voicing, of math in EPUB reading systems. In particular, how do we effect real change?